Overview
Military installations represent some of the most significant economic, cultural, and strategic assets within Utah communities. According to an August 2021 report published by the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute at the University of Utah, Utah’s defense industry contributes an estimated $19 billion in annual economic activity statewide, accounting for approximately 10.6% of Utah’s total gross domestic product (GDP) and 10.3% of all full- and part-time employment within the state.
A fact sheet published by the United States Department of Defense further highlights the importance of Utah’s military installations:
- Utah is home to Hill Air Force Base, the Air Force’s second-largest base, with an estimated annual economic impact exceeding $3 billion and approximately 21,000 personnel supporting operations.
- Camp Williams encompasses more than 23,000 acres of training areas supporting guard, reserve, and active-duty military operations and also supports significant cybersecurity-related infrastructure.
Unlike many traditional land uses, military installations require specialized planning considerations because surrounding development can directly affect ongoing operations and future mission capabilities. Incompatible development may create challenges related to:
- Aircraft operations and safety.
- Noise exposure.
- Height obstructions.
- Light interference.
- Public safety.
- Future military mission requirements.
As communities surrounding military installations continue to grow, local governments must carefully balance competing interests, including housing needs, economic development, private property rights, and the protection of critical military missions. Effective land use planning and coordination can help ensure that new development occurs in a manner that supports both community growth and long-term military viability.
Recognizing the importance of this balance, the Utah State Legislature enacted new requirements during the 2024 General Session intended to strengthen coordination between local governments and military installations and encourage consideration of military compatibility during the land use planning process. NOTE: Refinements were made during the 2026 General Session to include the Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant.
Content Contributors: Jones and DeMille Engineering, Inc, Hansen Planning Group, LLC / Rural Community Consultants
Special Note: This material was developed by civiclinQ for the Land Use Academy of Utah (LUAU). Funding for the development of this material was provided by through the Land Use Training Fund, which is administered by the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman , utilizing a portion of the 1% surcharge on all building permits in the State of Utah.
The role of this organization in administering funding is primarily administrative and should not be viewed as legal advice. Always consult your legal representative when addressing land use activities.
Use the ‘Materials’ tab above to view related course materials, including printable pass-along card and PDF version of this online course.
